Home Office Stats Show Increase in Number of Scientific Procedures Carried Out On Animals

Animals Count is deeply saddened to see that Home Office statistics released this week show an increase in the number of scientific procedures carried out on animals in 2010. The number has continued to rise over the past 10 years with 2010 seeing a million more animals used than in 2000.
Overall usage in 2010 was up on 2009 by 3 per cent. This can largely be explained by the number of animals being involved in breeding genetically modified (GM) and harmful mutants (HM).
Procedures on mice, birds and fish have all risen. Sadly, there has also been a large increase in the number of procedures on non-human primates. Procedures on new world monkeys (the group including marmosets, lemurs and capuchins) have increased by 78 percent.
Any increase in the use of non-human primates for scientific procedures is deeply troubling – the sentience and social nature of these animals means that suffering brought about by experimentation and captivity is likely to be at an extremely high level.
Thankfully, there were some small notes of positivity amongst the figures. Species for which usage had decreased include cats (-32%), guinea pigs(-29%), pigs(-15%), rabbits(-10%), rats(-9%), horses(-5%), and dogs(-2%).
The full report can be found here homeoffice
Animals Count of course remains against the harmful use of animals for scientific experimentation.
We seek:
An immediate ban on the harmful use of all primate species.
An immediate ban on the genetic manipulation of animals (including cloning).
An immediate ban on the use of animals for xenotransplantation.
A ban on all harmful use of animals within biomedical research, toxicity testing and education.
Increased funding for the further development, scientific validation and implementation of alternative methodologies.
In the interim, the following policies should be implemented:
Immediate, quantitative, binding targets for reductions in animal use with the aim of eventually replacing all harmful animal use with non-harmful or non-animal alternatives.
Mandatory, independent ethical review of all experimental protocols as a condition of licensing, with ample opportunity for prior, independent and public scrutiny of such protocols.
Mandatory retrospective evaluation to assess the degree to which experimental objectives were successfully met, the extent to which animals suffered, and to help inform both future research and further experimental licensing decisions.
Mandatory compliance as a condition of experimental funding, licensing, and publication of results, with a range of best practice standards, and each of the 3Rs: replacement, reduction and refinement of animal use, before and during experiments. These would include: minimum standards relating to animal sourcing, housing, environmental enrichment, opportunities for social interaction for social species, appropriate use of anaesthetics and analgesics (pain-killers), animal handling, non-invasive endpoints, and statistical input during experimental design.
Mandatory prompt, public sharing of all experimental results, to minimize experimental duplication.
Increased, compulsory training and continuing professional development in experimental best practice standards and alternative methodologies, for all animal researchers and technicians.
The provision of independently-scrutinized sanctuaries, maintained to high welfare standards, funded by industries and sectors using animals, for those animals retired from laboratory animal use, in which such animals shall be housed for the remainder of their natural lives.